|
Provided by Am Echad Resources:
Information and Opinion from a Traditional Jewish Perspective
Archives Of Previous Articles IV
Common Jewish Language: RIP
Rabbi Avi Shafran
Jews - even those of us for whom English is our native tongue - are increasingly
speaking different languages.
Take the word "outreach". Used for decades - and to this day by Orthodox Jews
- to mean efforts to bring Jews closer to their religious heritage, the word has been
co-opted by some contemporary Jewish leaders to describe conversion overtures to non-Jews
who have married Jews. Some have even employed it to mean the active proselytization of
broader non-Jewish society, which they endorse.
Or, to move to Hebrew, consider a word, "kollel", that has an illustrious
history as meaning an intensive high-level Talmudic research fellowship. A kollel has
always been comprised of advanced scholars analyzing Jewish texts according to
centuries-old traditional methodologies. Of late, however, it has been appropriated
for things like an adult education program offering lectures like "Chicken Soup from
the Rabbis: Sermons that Really Worked."
And then there is the word "Midrash" which, for 3000 years, was reserved for
the "Oral Law" portion of the Jewish religious tradition, the authoritative
meaning of, and addenda to, the Jewish Bible's laws and narratives. Lately, though,
"Midrash" has been redefined in some circles to mean any creative exercise of
imagination regarding Judaism's holiest text, a sort of bible game for all to play. Thus,
Rutgers University English professor and "midrashist" Alicia Ostriker, who
teaches "midrash workshops" for the Institute of Contemporary Midrash, can
write, as she does in the current issue of Reform Judaism, that "Midrash"
writing "requires no special knowledge of the Bible."
The critical word "halacha" is another good example of a word whose meaning
has been changed by some. Since well before the Talmudic era, it has described the demands
of Jewish religious law, painstakingly researched and applied to life situations. Today,
though, it has been employed to mean whatever a group of rabbis (and even laymen) vote as
their own determination of what the times - rather than the texts and spirit of the law -
require; in effect, a culture-driven system of religious praxis.
Even the most basic Jewish words, those we use constantly, have come to assume
different meanings for different Jews. "Rabbi" once meant someone learned in
Jewish religious texts and law; today, in many Jewish circles, it means someone who can
provide the pastoral needs of a congregation or someone who is a good public speaker (or,
best of all, both) - even if he (or she) is ignorant of (or entirely unconcerned with) the
Talmud and responsa literature.
Even the word "Judaism" itself, tragically, has become multiple-meaninged.
That process began when German Jews during the previous century created a movement that
unabashedly laid aside the idea of divinely revealed commandments - the essential
underpinning of the Jewish religious tradition - and yet insisted on retaining the name
"Judaism", albeit with a prefix.
That movement's American descendant came in turn to catalyze a number of even newer
"Judaisms" - among them at least one group that goes so far as to shun the
concept of a Creator. The movements are Jewish - in the sense that they are the products
of Jewish people and have many Jewish affiliates - but calling them "Judaisms"
does violence to what the word has meant for dozens of centuries.
"Torah", too, has come to be similarly disfigured. One Jewish leader
proclaimed his movement's embrace of "Torah, Torah, Torah!" even though the word
"Torah" claims more than 3000 years of synonymity with the very concept of
revealed law that his movement openly renounces. The same leader also mangled the word
"mitzvah" - whose literal and historical meaning is "commandment":
"[U]ltimately," he wrote, " [a Jew] must examine each mitzvah and ask
the question: 'do I feel commanded in this instance ...?'"
Feeling that something is right and being commanded to do it would seem to be
alternatives - perhaps at times compatible, even overlapping, concepts - but certainly not
a cause and its effect.
Is it any wonder that the very word "Jew", frighteningly, has likewise
assumed manifold meanings? To some, it continues, as in the past, to refer to children of
a Jewish mother or to a convert who has met the demanding conversion requirements of
Jewish religious law. To others, it also means anyone born of a Jewish father, as long as
some degree of self-Jewish-identification is present. Or it means Gentiles who
"convert" to Judaism on nothing much more than an expression of interest in
being Jewish. With this particular difference of definition, the seeds of a bifurcated
Jewish people were tragically sown.
Those of us - one hopes it is all of us - who lament the increasing fragmentation of
the Jewish world would do well to ponder the radically different ways Jews have come to
use crucial Jewish words today - and then ponder, hard and deep, the possibility that true
unity might just lie in our return to a common language.
AM ECHAD RESOURCES
[Rabbi Avi Shafran serves as Agudath Israel of America's director of public affairs and
as Am Echad's American director]
Our New Mixed Multitude
JONATHAN ROSENBLUM
Neither friend nor foe ever accused David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, of
being a theocrat. Yet Ben-Gurion believed in Israel as a Jewish state, as proclaimed in
the Declaration of Independence.
He realized that only a common Jewish identity could provide the social cohesion for a
population drawn from more than 100 countries and facing formidable challenges to national
existence. So he appropriated religious symbols, created the Chief Rabbinate, and located
the new state in the continuum of Jewish history as the third Jewish commonwealth.
For Ben-Gurion, Israel was not a nation like all others, confined to specific
geographic boundaries. Rather, Israel belonged to the entire Jewish people, and the entire
Jewish people belonged to Israel. The classic expression of that vision of Israel is the
Law of Return, conferring automatic citizenship on any Jew.
It is one of history's ironies, then, that the Law of Return has become the single
greatest threat to Israel's Jewish identity. The Interior Ministry has a computer file of
more than 200,000 non-Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union. And the leading
experts in clarification of Jewish status believe the true figure is nearly twice as high.
Even those figures do not begin to convey the scope of the problem. The Immigration and
Absorption Ministry acknowledges that nearly 60 percent of recent immigrants are not
Jewish.
That is a conservative figure. A survey of 100 recent immigrants by the ministry found
75 non-Jews, and two weeks ago the Knesset heard testimony that of the 1,004 new
immigrants from Chaburusk only 38 were Jewish. Among those of marriageable age, the
percentage of non-Jews in the total immigration is much higher.
The percentage of non-Jews will only grow. There are many with a vested interest in
increasing the immigration from the former Soviet Union, without regard to religious
status. More and more, the Russian aliya provides the Jewish Agency with its sole raison
d'etre. And that requires numbers.
Another vested interest is the Reform Movement. American Jewish parents rarely demand
even the most pro forma conversion from their children's non-Jewish spouses, which has
severely cut into the market for clergymen advertising their conversion services.
But in Russia, they have something of tangible economic benefit to peddle. With the
conversion certificate goes automatic Israeli citizenship. The Russian gets his
certificate and the Reform Movement claims another adherent.
Concern with non-Jewish immigration has little to do with the personal characteristics
of the immigrants. Be they computer programmers or drunken louts, prostitutes or puritans,
first violinists or vicious antisemites, they are still not Jewish.
One may dream of another 1,000,000 immigrants from the former Soviet Union, as the
prime minister says he does, or one can pay obeisance to the idea of a Jewish state
(however defined), but it is pure cynicism to claim to favor both. INDEED, those most
supportive of non-Jewish immigration are those most eager to remove all vestiges of Jewish
life from the public sphere.Then Tommy Lapid speaks of the Russian aliya as having a
valuable "balancing" function, he does not even have to say who is being
balanced: the darker and more religious elements of society.
The Jewish Agency emissaries in the former Soviet Union, says Dov Kontorer, senior
editor at the Russian-language daily Vesti, have "fully internalized the ideology of
creating a new Israeli nation, for which Slavs are preferable to Moroccans and
haredim."
Still it might be asked: If we gain computer programmers, what do we have to lose? Why
did Uri Gordon, the former head of the Jewish Agency's aliya department, term the
immigration of hundreds of thousands with no ties to the Jewish people "a form of
national suicide"?
And why did a senior member of the Immigration and Absorption Ministry staff recommend
this week a series of amendments to the Law of Return to remedy the situation whereby 10
non-Jews can enter Israel on the basis of the long-departed Jewish ancestor of one of
them?
Here are a few answers. The mass non-Jewish immigration undermines the very legitimacy
of Israel. The spate of bills introduced by Arab Knesset members to amend the definition
of Israel as a Jewish state and to recognize an Arab right of return derive their
credibility from the non-Jewish immigration.
What answer do we have to the question: Why should Natasha from Kiev, whose ancestors
had no connection to the Jewish people, be preferred to Ahmad, whose family tilled the
land around Safed for centuries?
In addition, non-Jewish immigration further erodes whatever remains of national
cohesion. The fundamental characteristic of a nation is the ability of its members to
identify who is a citizen and who is not. Jews throughout history at least agreed on one
definition of who is a Jew. Like all democratic states, the Jewish people recognized only
one category of citizenship.
Increasingly, however, different groups of people calling themselves "Jews"
do not recognize others claiming the same title for themselves.
As a consequence, a common Jewish identity no longer has the power to bind divergent
groups it once did. Mass immigration of non-Jews only exacerbates that diminished sense of
common identity.
Finally, mass immigration of non-Jews has the potential to trigger a social
conflagration the likes of which we have never seen. Israelis of Middle Eastern descent,
who had just begin to recover from the devastation of their own absorption in the country,
feel they are being shunted aside in favor of those who are not even Jewish. The
resentment aroused by this sense of being shoved back into the underclass has little to do
with religion.
The pork shops and churches of the non-Jewish immigrants are merely the most potent
symbols of the contempt in which the Middle Eastern population feels it is held. Even
crucifix-wearing, pork-eating Russians are considered preferable to them.
From our birth as a people in Egypt, the association with mixed multitudes attaching
themselves to us has not been a happy one. Nor will it be today.
(c) 1999 The Jerusalem Post
[Jonathan Rosenblum, a biographer and columnist, directs the Israel
Office of Am Echad]
The Shopping Bag Ladies
Malky Lowinger
It's 8:00 A.M. at the Satmar Bikur Cholim kitchen on Bedford Avenue in Brooklyn, and
the place is already a beehive of activity. Svetlana and "the Rebbetzin" are
stirring huge pots of chicken soup. Esther and Leah are chopping fresh vegetables. The
answering machine light blinks urgently.
Mrs. Teitelbaum, petite and middle-aged, is clearly in charge. She sits down at her
desk and listens to her messages. The Brody family called at midnight. Their daughter is
being discharged from NYU; cancel her food package. Joseph from Long Island will be
hospitalized for a week and he needs diabetic-safe food. If it's not too much trouble,
says Mrs. Heller, could the salad for her father be prepared without tomatoes today?
Here at Satmar Bikur Cholim, established by the Satmar Rebbetzin in 1957 to provide
assistance to the sick and the needy, and funded by private donations, nothing is too much
trouble. The group happily and proudly offers a variety of services, though the ladies of
Satmar are best known for their food packages, and especially their chicken soup.
The Bikur Cholim kitchen is located in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, the epicenter of the
Satmar Chassidic sect. A tightly-knit, thriving community with highly disciplined
religious standards, the Satmar are best known to most Jews for
their unyielding stance against Zionism. They consider the establishment of a Jewish State
before the Messiah's arrival as wrong and as a dangerous affront to the other nations of
the world. Yet on this particular morning, political philosophy is the furthest thing from
anyone's mind.
Ruchie, Layalah, and Frumie are assembling the food packages. The Bikur Cholim kitchen,
a model of cleanliness and efficiency, is their pride and joy. One can actually imagine
eating off the floors here. The activity is non-stop. Fruit and vegetable salads are
lovingly placed into plastic containers, fresh rolls and cake packed into bags. And the
soup, the famously delicious chicken soup, is carefully ladled into thermos containers, to
maintain its heat, flavor and, presumably, curative properties until it reaches its
intended recipients.
Each day, the volunteers assemble a hundred and fifty customized hot and wholesome
meals, which are then distributed to Jewish patients, regardless of level of observance or
affiliation, at fifteen metropolitan area hospitals. The recipients, many of whom have
never eaten a kosher meal before in their lives (and many more of whom insist that the
Satmar Bikur Cholim packages are helping to bring about their speedy recovery) are brought
to the Satmar ladies' attention through family, friends or the hospital chaplain.
No computer sits on Mrs. Teitelbaum's desk, and no high-tech machinery graces the
kitchen. Yet the place is a model of order and efficiency. Mrs. Teitelbaum laughs at the
suggestion of storing the daily information in a database. She points to her head.
"The best computer in the world," she says, with an old-world wisdom that has
quite apparently served her well thus far.
At ten o'clock, a new team of volunteers bursts in the door. The women doing the
cooking and packing are dressed in housecoats and turbans; the new group is smartly turned
out in designer suits and stylish wigs. They're all ready to spend the day in the big
city.
"I volunteer my time once a week," says Rivka, in a chocolate-colored tweed
suit, "but some of the women volunteer two or three full days every week year in,
year out." The food is carefully packed into shopping bags and last minute
instructions are delivered. Twenty five women then pile onto the Bikur Cholim bus, eager
to be on their way to performing a very special mitzvah.
As the bus makes its way onto the Williamsburg Bridge, the Bikur Cholim women settle
down to their routines. Reizie takes a cellphone from her pocketbook. "This is when I
call in my fish and grocery order," she explains. Matti takes out a siddur and begins
her morning prayers. Chaya and Estie begin an animated conversation. "Did you hear
that Suri made a shidduch last night?"
These women are Bikur Cholim veterans; they've been making the rounds at the city's
hospitals for years. The names of New York's most prestigious medical centers easily roll
of their tongues. Matti's been visiting Beth Israel and "Joint Diseases" for
thirteen years. "That's my route twice a week," she says. Reizie lays claim to
Lenox. And Leah reveals that she visits Mount Sinai "with a shopping cart. The
doctors, the nurses, they all know my shopping cart. It's famous."
"We really get to know the patients," explains Sally, who visits Memorial
Cancer Center every Thursday. "And the ones who go home to recover," she says,
in Yiddish-influenced English, "we keep in touch with them too." It's not easy
maintaining friendships with the critically ill, though, Sally confides, "especially
when some of them never make it home at all."
"I lost two patients last week," she adds quietly. "It was very hard for
me." For a moment it's easy to forget that Sally is just a visiting volunteer, and
not "her" patients' doctor.
Reizie leans over to make a point. "We're not Satmar," she says, indicating
her two sisters who accompany her every week. "But this group is so wonderful that we
felt we had to join." Her first experience with Bikur Cholim wasn't easy. She was
asked to fill in for a volunteer who unexpectedly took a day off. Destination? Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. "I saw a lot of pain and suffering that day," she
recalls. The experience was harrowing, but it left an indelible positive impression.
"I'll never forget the way the patients' eyes would light up when they saw
me," she says. "I honestly don't know what they look forward to more, the
chicken soup or just having someone to talk to."
The bus weaves through the traffic along First Avenue, dropping off the women at each
one's designated location. Sally gets off at Memorial carrying several shopping bags. They
are surprisingly heavy, but she manages well. She has her routine. She drops off her
jacket in the coat room and stops by the Rabbi's office to ask if any new patients have
been admitted. As she passes the visitor's lounge, she scans the room and her trained eye
settles on a middle-aged man sitting alone in a corner. He looks Jewish and seems worried.
As Sally approaches, he looks up and sees her food-laden shopping bags.
"Satmar?" he asks. Sally smiles. She's used to this. Her shopping bags, like
Leah's cart, are
famous.
Moments later this virtual stranger is confiding the details of his wife's illness to
Sally, who listens intently and sympathetically, showing familiarity with the medical
jargon. Over time she's become something of an expert in medicine. She offers the man a
food package and he happily accepts. His wife isn't able to eat anything, but he's
starving and will have it for lunch. "And what about tomorrow?" Sally prods
gently. "And by tomorrow your wife will probably be able to eat jello and clear
broth. I'll order it for you." And she quickly scribbles a note onto her card. Later
she will call Mrs. Teitelbaum, who will store this information on the computer in her
head.
Sally makes her way across the floor. She greets the interns and nurses, who seem to
know her well. Many of the patients are too ill to accept guests; some are fast asleep.
But their families are delighted to talk to someone who isn't dressed in hospital scrubs.
On the eighth floor she visits an Israeli family who have been here for three months with
their eight-year-old son.
"It's been very difficult for them," Sally explains. "Things are always
up and down." After chatting with the family for several minutes, Sally goes on to
the outpatient clinic, where some chemotherapy treatment is administered. Bikur Cholim has
customized packages for this unit too. She fills the communal refrigerator with sealed
bags of sandwiches, salad, and desserts. Then she waves at Jeremy, speaks to Yossele, and
exchanges pleasantries with a young mother whose daughter is busy playing with a doll
house. Here, most of the children have lost their hair, yet no one seems in the least self
conscious. They just go about the business of being kids, despite the massive weight
hanging precariously over their heads.
The Bikur Cholim bus will be returning to Williamsburg at two o'clock, bringing most of
the volunteers back home. Sally, though, won't be on it. "I like to stay here a bit
longer," she explains, "and spend some extra time with the children."
Outside the hospital, life in the big city marches relentlessly on. Everyone seems
entirely preoccupied, oblivious to the troubles of those who are hospitalized in their
very midst, within these massive medical facilities. On the corner there is a newstand.
The day's headlines, three inches tall, scream "Yankees Win!" Derek Jeter is
pictured, grinning from ear to ear. Someone is pouring champagne over his head. A city of
nine million people pays tribute to its heroes.
It's probably safe to say that Sally, Reizie, and Matti don't know a shortstop from a
shortcake.
But that's okay. We all have our heroes.
[Ms. Lowinger is a freelance writer in Brooklyn]
Bombshell In Italian
Custody Battle: Father Revealed As Convert To Catholicism
Agudath Israel Petitions Italian Officials To Overturn Anti-Orthodox
Custody Decision
NEW YORK - As an Italian appeals court prepares to consider the custody case of two
Orthodox Jewish children separated from the charedi mother who raised them and placed them
with their non-observant father, a stunning development - the father's reported conversion
to Catholicism - has prompted renewed calls for the Italian authorities to ensure that the
children will not be forcibly torn away from their faith.
The case concerns the 14 and 10 year-old daughters of Moshe Dulberg and his former
wife, who is now remarried and a practicing Orthodox Jew. The girls, who were spirited by
their mother to Israel and lived with her there for eight years before an Israeli court
returned them to Italy, were ordered placed with their father earlier this year by a court
in Genoa. It has now been revealed that Mr. Dulberg has apparently severed his ties to his
Jewish heritage by formally converting to Catholicism. This striking development, along
with reports of extreme steps that Mr. Dulberg has taken to prevent his daughters from
maintaining their Jewish religious lifestyle - including forcing them to listen to New
Testament readings - has heightened the sense of World Jewry's urgent concern for the
welfare of the two children.
In missives to Italy's prime minister, president, ambassador to the United Nations and
ambassador to the United States, Agudath Israel World Organization's director of
international affairs, Professor Harry Reicher - himself a professor of international law
at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law -- alerted the Italian officials to the
serious problems the Genoa court's decision raises under the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, to which Italy is a party.
That agreement, like the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, proclaims the
right to individual freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Another international
agreement, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, explicitly applies those rights to
children. Professor Reicher also cited an article in the latter convention that insists
that "a child belonging to [a religious] minority... shall not be denied the right...
to enjoy his or her own culture, to profess and practice his or her own religion, or to
use his or her own language."
"The Court," asserts Professor Reicher, "has not only ignored these
basic tenets, but has set about a course of 'social engineering' to 'wean' the girls away
from their strongly professed and sincerely held Jewish heritage."
The Genoa court seemed to imply that it views Orthodox Jewish religious practice as
unacceptable and that the mother's Orthodox Jewish life was prima facie proof of her
parental incompetence; it ruled that their father see that the girls "re-enter models
of cultural life and alternative conduct: by reading books of all kinds, familiarization
with elements of cultural communication..."
The court, moreover, was told by psychologists that Orthodox Jews view
"exploitation and abuse of children" as legitimate, and refused the local rabbi
and former Israeli Finance Minister Yaakov Neeman the right to testify to the contrary
about Jewish belief or practice. It has been charged that the court.
Further, the court virtually severed the girls from their mother, denying them any
contact with their past life, a situation Professor Reicher characterizes as
"horrific." Their mother is allowed to speak to each daughter for no more than
ten minutes twice a week, and only in Italian. Her ex-husband tapes the conversations. The
girls are permitted to see their mother only three times a month, in a location designated
by their father and in the presence of people chosen by him. Again all conversation must
be in Italian.
Making the matter even more troubling, notes Professor Reicher, is the fact that the
girls feel threatened by their father, who was described by a preliminary psychological
exam three years ago as "immature," "narcissistic," and prone to
"uncontrolled bursts of aggression," and that they desperately want to live as
Orthodox Jews with their mother.
In transcripts of telephone conversations with a third party, one of the girls
describes her father as "frightening" and as threatening his daughters with
physical punishment for their determination to rejoin their mother.
Testifying before the Genoa Minors' Court, the same girl stated that "My life was
happy in Israel. The other girls in the school in Genoa live a very different life-style
than the life I lived in Israel... I wish to point out that on the day of the first
hearing before the court for minors, my father came home and told me, 'You have no hope
any more.'... In Israel I was much more free than I am here."
Before the same court, her sister asserted that, "The people who love me are 1) my
mother, 2) my sister." And, in a letter to her mother: "I am longing for you so
much... [Father] is screaming all day, it's impossible to stand him, he's absolutely crazy
and he says that we will never go back to Bnei Brak..."
The girls are reportedly afraid to talk to anyone in the local Jewish community for
fear that such contacts will be used as an excuse to cut off their last ties with their
mother.
With a hearing of an appeal of the court decision scheduled for December 2, Agudath
Israel and other organizations, like the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish
Organizations and the Orthodox Union, are asking Italian officials to recognize the
devastating human impact of the Genoa court 's decision. In his communication, Professor
Reicher urged those officials to intervene and insist that the country's
"international obligations be upheld, and that the girls be afforded every
opportunity to practice their religious beliefs freely, and without fear or
interference."
"The eyes of the Jewish world are upon your country and its judicial system,"
the Agudath Israel World Organization missive concluded. " We urge you to do
everything within your power to reverse the terrible course that this case has taken thus
far."
The new revelations about Mr. Dulberg's religious affiliation, contends Professor
Reicher, provide all the more reason for the the Italian court - which referred to Mr.
Dulberg as a "pure Jew, who observes the commandments" - to reverse its original
ruling. |